Freedom The Open Source Way Contribute Articles or News to OSForgeOSForge HomeLogout from Forums
Contacting OSForgeOSForge HomeAbout OSForge
  

Root
Contribute News
Learning Corner
Linux Distributions
Linux Common FAQ's
Discussion Forums
Community Gallery
Links Directory
Search OSForge
Networking
Industry Updates
Linux & Open Source
Opinions
Press Release
Programming
Security
Web Development

White Paper
Plat'Home Launches First Linux-based Eco-Friendly Servers In United States
World’s Largest Python Conference Sees 70 Percent Jump in Attendance
Leading SaaS Infrastructure Provider Deploys Zenoss to Improve Uptime and Reduce Cost
JasperSoft is Most Widely-Deployed Business Intelligence Software in the World
Cluster Resources to Showcase Adaptive Windows/Linux Cluster at BrainShare
Funambol Helps New AGPLv3 Open Source License Gain Formal OSI Approval
Zenoss Sponsors PyCon 2008 and Leads Application Monitoring Discussion
The Linux Foundation Reveals Speaker Line-up for 2nd Annual Collaboration Summit
Zenoss Core Named 2008 CODiE Awards Finalist for Best Open Source Solution

View More »

Site Defacements
By : Lew Newlin Find more article by Lew Newlin on Internet-Networking
Tuesday the 9th, August 2005 at 12:57 PM (CDT)
Send this Story to a Friend Readers TalkBack (0) - 1107 Reads

Printer Friendly Page Printable format
Send this Story to a Friend Foward to Email

Article on web site defacements and steps that can be taken to prevent and lessen the impact.

A valid fear every webmaster faces is the defacement of their site. According to the Computer Security Institute (CSI), 2005 Computer Crime and Security Survey, web site defacements are the “fastest-growing” area of incident. A check of Zone-H.org seems to validate the finding with a display of over 750 sites defacement for a single date (8/15/2005).

To address defacements, it is first important to understand how defacements occur and what can be done to prevent them. Generally, sites can be vulnerable due to undisclosed vulnerabilities in vendor software, a missing security patch, misconfiguration, and/or bad site programming. Any of these vulnerabilities could permit an attacker to gain access that would allow defacement.

While not much can be done concerning undisclosed vendor vulnerabilities, the other causes are correctable. When vendor security patches are released, install them quickly. When patches are released, many attackers are reverse engineering the patch to discover the vulnerability being addressed. It is not uncommon to find exploit code published on the internet within 48 hours of a patch’s release.

Verify your server and site configurations. Specific areas of concern are normally FTP upload rights, site publishing rights, server login privileges, open ports and passwords. Delete or seriously restrict the ability of people to anonymously upload files. Check for the use of default passwords and for ones that can be easily guessed. Double check your systems open ports and the publishing rights of your web server software. Numerous companies offer free products or free initial vulnerability scans that can confirm your system settings. Using the search engine term “free vulnerability scanning” will yield dozens of companies and products.

Check your site code to verify errors and unintended data are being dealt with correctly. Regardless of what a visitor does, input should be validated and all errors should return a graceful message. A few areas to check: are your pages vulnerable to buffer overruns due to incorrect data being entered; are your pages vulnerable to SQL or scripting code injection; does your error messages reveal sensitive information such as connection strings, passwords, or system information?

Establish a schedule and process to monitor system changes, configurations, and code. While researching this article, I noticed a Zone-H posting that a Microsoft United Kingdom site was defaced. While the attacker did not publish how the attack was executed, it is safe to assume configuration played a large role. Software features change with each patch applied, mistakes happen and code changes.

The CSI report points out that the dollar losses caused by web site defacements are actually very low in relation to losses suffered by viruses and the theft of proprietary information. The report goes on to state that “losses (such as the lost future sales due to negative media coverage following a breach)” were not largely represented in the cost figures. I believe that most victims of site defacements will agree that embarrassment far outweighs the dollar loss suffered.

When considering defacement strategies, web site monitoring services should also be considered. Many monitoring services offer the ability to check for the existence of keywords or page changes. While monitoring services will not prevent defacements, site monitoring will at least alert you of the event. Hopefully, before you suffer negative media coverage.

About the Author
Lew Newlin is CTO of SiteRecon, a provider of internet email monitoring and web site monitoring services for business.

  
Reader Rating from 1-5

 

Poor very 

1

2

3

4

5
 very Excellent

Talkback

Post Your Talkback | View All Talkback (0 Posted)


 Currently there are no Talkback posted on "Site Defacements", Click here to be the first to post a talkback.


 
Scroll Up

   About | Term of Use | Privacy | Contact us | Tell a Friend | Advertise  

OSForge News RSS Feed