Freedom The Open Source Way Contribute Articles or News to OSForgeOSForge HomeLogout from Forums
Contacting OSForgeOSForge HomeAbout OSForge
  

Root
Contribute News
Learning Corner
Linux Distributions
Linux Common FAQ's
Discussion Forums
Community Gallery
Links Directory
Search OSForge
Networking
Industry Updates
Linux & Open Source
Opinions
Press Release
Programming
Security
Web Development

White Paper
Likewise Software Receives Ready for IBM Tivoli Validation
Plat'Home Unveils Final Results of “Will Linux Work?” Contest
Zenoss Announces Record Quarterly Customer Growth amid Struggling Economy
Latest Open-Xchange Server Edition Simplifies Integration, Easily Customizable
Cluster Resources Works With IBM to Provide Moab Hybrid Cluster on iDataPlex
Cluster Resources to Deomonstrate Moab Hybrid Cluster on Windows HPC Server 2008
Cluster Resources to Provide Moab Hybrid Cluster Solution on New Cray CX1(TM)
Plat'Home Unveils Winners of “Will Linux Work?” Contest
Zenoss Core Recognized as Best Open Source Network Monitoring Solution

View More

PHPNuke 5.01 -VS- PostNuke 0.61 Comparison
By : Isaac Golding Find more article by Isaac Golding on Opinions
Thursday the 16th, August 2001 at 11:31 AM (EDT)
Send this Story to a Friend Readers TalkBack (0) - 3183 Reads
Viewing Page 1 of 3

Printer Friendly Page Printable format
Send this Story to a Friend Foward to Email

The PHPNuke 5.01 -VS- PostNuke 0.61 Comparison Release 1 on 15 August 2001

Preface:

This is as close to an unbiased opinion that I can come to. Having been a user of PHPNuke for quite some time now and eventually migrating to the PostNuke system to give it a try. I still strive to maintain my ties to admin interfacthe PHPNuke community and always try to help fellow nukers whenever possible. . This comparison of PHPNuke and PostNuke is mine and mine alone. It doesn't not necessarily reflect that of the PHPNuke community or that of the PostNuke community. So please if you disagree with my statements don't direct them at one or the other of the CMS systems direct them at me.

Documentation PostNuke The Documentation on PostNuke at first was simply the PHPNuke documentation. However within a short period of time the documentation was written anew and it was good, thorough and professional. As of lately there have been a few speed bumps with the documentation as with any open source project. However it looks as if those issues are being worked out and the documentation should be well on track by the 1.0 release.

PHPNuke:

The Documentation on PHPNuke is spartan in nature and that is to be expected of a one man development team. The files give you instructions on how to install or upgrade the product as well as some decent coverage once the program is running on other various features. While the documentation does fit the bill it's nothing to get excited over. Bug System tracking PostNuke

PostNuke currently tracks bugs using the Source Forge Bug tracking system. This is a wonderful tool that systematically records and tracks any bug submitted by a registered user or an anonymous one. In addition to this there are forums and directly after the release period the staff is on standby at the site to answer questions posted as comments to the release statement. Overall all but the few really weird bugs are repaired within a 24-hour period, which lends great support to the success of PostNuke.

PHPNuke This is a sore subject with me as I started out using PHPNuke. In the beginning PHPNuke had a very active mailing list that the author killed, against the objections of the majority of users, as he wanted everything moved to the forums. Now the forums are gone as they had problems and the author for whatever reason chose to drop them. The Mailing List was never restarted and support went away from the official site. There appears to be no official support for any of the PHPNuke bugs that are found and it is all taken care of by the community at large. All of this I assume stems from a number of factors.

#1 the authors inability to keep up with all of the moving pieces (and there are a lot of moving pieces)

#2 Script kiddies bombarding forums and the e-mail list with their generally unpleasant comments about this or that.

#3. A large amount of bugs in a system that was not tested aggressively before implementing it on a production level site.
#4. The sudden surge in membership and overall site traffic on a site manned by a staff of one (1) Currently there is no OFFICIAL bug tracking system for the PHPNuke project that is known to the author. The site admin may be reading 3rd party forums or he might not but this is a feature sorely lacking on the part of PHPNuke.

Installation Script

PostNuke

This is a nice topic and a relatively new one. The concept is that you need not know a lot about sql to set it up. The PostNuke install.php script tries in a mostly successful manner to create the database or upgrade any PHPNuke database from 4.4 all the way up to the 5.01. If this fails there is a backup plan for those upgrading only (and this is not OFFICIAL) Hidden outside the html directory of the source package is a developer's CVS update script. It is soon to be incorporated into the install.php script but its current function is to upgrade whatever it finds in a current PostNuke beta database with new table information. In both cases if you are upgrading BACKUP YOUR FILES AND DATABASE first. This is all still new so something could go wrong.

PHPNuke

No install script


  Next Page (2 of 3)
Reader Rating from 1-5

 

Poor very 

1

2

3

4

5
 very Excellent

Talkback

Post Your Talkback | View All Talkback (0 Posted)


 Currently there are no Talkback posted on "PHPNuke 5.01 -VS- PostNuke 0.61 Comparison", Click here to be the first to post a talkback.


 
Scroll Up

   About | Term of Use | Privacy | Contact us | Tell a Friend | Advertise  

OSForge News RSS Feed