Freedom The Open Source Way Contribute Articles or News to OSForgeOSForge HomeLogout from Forums
Contacting OSForgeOSForge HomeAbout OSForge
  

Root
Contribute News
Learning Corner
Linux Distributions
Linux Common FAQ's
Discussion Forums
Community Gallery
Links Directory
Search OSForge
Networking
Industry Updates
Linux & Open Source
Opinions
Press Release
Programming
Security
Web Development

White Paper
DAKCS Software Systems Introduces Innovative Customer Training Program
Zarafa and ClearCenter Announce ClearOS Integration
Zarafa Brings Browser-Based Enterprise Collaboration Client to CeBIT
Zarafa Catalyses Software Development Collaboration by Launching git.zarafa.com
Zarafa and LPI Partner on Training and Certification Program
Likewise to Grow Seattle-Area Workforce
Likewise CTO: Unleash and Secure Unstructured Data
Likewise Names Leading Open Source Voice as CTO
Launched: Zarafa Collaboration Platform 7.0 and Zarafa Archiver

View More »

Who's liable for Linux?
By : Satsuki [www] Find more article by Satsuki on Opinion
Friday the 18th, July 2003 at 12:04 PM (EDT)
Send this Story to a Friend Readers TalkBack (0) - 2226 Reads

Printer Friendly Page Printable format
Send this Story to a Friend Foward to Email

COMMENTARY--It's the next big Linux controversy: Who should be liable if customers wind up using software that was created from misappropriated intellectual property?

Linux resellers are not especially eager to tackle the question, but they know it lurks just over the horizon, thanks to the filing of the SCO-IBM lawsuit earlier this year. Ever since then, chief information officers have been reading that they could be vulnerable to future litigation for using open-source software.

None of this has escaped the attention of Microsoft and other like-minded suppliers of proprietary software. They are making sure customers know all about the protection plans they offer in the event that a company winds up in this sort of legal bind.

But when it comes to the indemnification question, the Linux crowd is ducking the issue. Not SuSE Linux, not Red Hat--not even IBM, the biggest Linux reseller of them all--says it plans to extend an indemnification umbrella to its customers.



Read full article at - zdnet.com.com

  
Reader Rating from 1-5

 

Poor very 

1

2

3

4

5
 very Excellent

Talkback

Post Your Talkback | View All Talkback (0 Posted)


 Currently there are no Talkback posted on "Who's liable for Linux?", Click here to be the first to post a talkback.


 
Scroll Up

   About | Term of Use | Privacy | Contact us | Tell a Friend | Advertise  

OSForge News RSS Feed